Let us take a quick look at an unbalanced strategy against a balanced strategy. Here K-O and Hi-Lo are compared. Hi-Lo has a slightly better SCORE than K-O here primarily because it was simmed with more indexes. But the point of the chart is that the performance of unbalanced (e.g., K-O) and balanced strategies (e.g., Hi-Lo) have very similar patterns even though the previous pages showed that their counts and advantages at different depths act very differently.
These strategies work somewhat differently — but in the long run their performance characteristics are very similar
.
www.qfit.com/book/z70Chart.gif
· Six decks, S17, DAS, LS, Heads-Up, Hi-Lo, truncate, half-deck resolution, penetrations from 26-130 cards cutoff by the card, optimal betting
· Six decks, S17, DAS, LS, Heads-Up, K-O-P, penetrations from 26-130 cards cutoff by the card, optimal betting
· Two billion rounds each
© 2009 Norman Wattenberger
